Talk:Neuropercolation
From Scholarpedia
Dear Dr. Kozma,
I had a question about the possibility of a slight notational error in the equations in example 3.
Example 3 features the following equation:
$p^{-}_{0} = p^{-}_{1} = p^{-}_{2} = (1-p) = p^{+}_{0} = p^{+}_{1} = p^{+}_{2}$
which expresses the probability of a node being active in the next time step if the minority of the neighbouring nodes are inactive. If I understood the notation correctly, should the LHS of the equation not be:
$p^{-}_{3} = p^{-}_{4} = p^{-}_{5}$ instead of $p^{-}_{0} = p^{-}_{1} = p^{-}_{2}$?
